American Nations
By Colin Woodard
- Release Date: 2011-09-29
- Genre: History
Description
• A New Republic Best Book of the Year • The Globalist Top Books of the Year • Winner of the Maine Literary Award for Non-fiction
Particularly relevant in understanding who voted for who during presidential elections, this is an endlessly fascinating look at American regionalism and the eleven “nations” that continue to shape North America
According to award-winning journalist and historian Colin Woodard, North America is made up of eleven distinct nations, each with its own unique historical roots. In American Nations he takes readers on a journey through the history of our fractured continent, offering a revolutionary and revelatory take on American identity, and how the conflicts between them have shaped our past and continue to mold our future. From the Deep South to the Far West, to Yankeedom to El Norte, Woodard (author of American Character: A History of the Epic Struggle Between Individual Liberty and the Common Good) reveals how each region continues to uphold its distinguishing ideals and identities today, with results that can be seen in the composition of the U.S. Congress or on the county-by-county election maps of any hotly contested election in our history.
Reviews
Can't wait to read this again!
5By DanielntlionsSuch a well-researched chronology of evidence-based history that answered so many of my questions!American Nations
4By Bodhiboy65This book is now a timeless classic!Revelatory
5By BoldCoastWoodard is a highly underrated historian and ought to be required reading.Assertions Presented as Facts
1By phobiophobiaThe fact that Woodard is a journalist as opposed to a historian is clear just from the incredibly grating writing style. The book constantly presents assertions as though they are plain facts, and occasionally outright dismisses valid alternate explanations as incorrect without bothering to provide arguments for why his framework is superior. It consequently leaves little room for nuance, despite the fact that the boundaries of his proposed “nations” are definitionally arbitrary. I’m not even saying that his underlying thesis is wrong (it’s certainly interesting), but the unacademic approach makes it hard to take this book seriously.Good but slightly disillusioned
3By tri3ngulr_stanRead the book and enjoyed it until I did some research on the author, Colin Woodard. Although he did do a lot of research Woodard isn’t an actual historian, at least to my current knowledge, making this seem somewhat disingenuous. He also uses labels for the American “nations” that aren’t commonly used by actual historians which, again, is according to my current knowledge. In the end though, it appears to be a thoroughly researched book with interesting ideas and thoughts.Huge Disappointment
2By John KannonThis book was not good for me personally, but I can see the draw to others. I find history interesting, but not much in this book speaks to my specific interests. The text is super dense and just seems like the reader gets pelted with facts. I found it arduous to read and found myself wishing that the book would end. I ended up reading less than 1/3 of the book even though I had a test on it.American Nations
3By GreatBallsOFireIf you would like to believe that (republican) neo-confederates working for substandard wages in foreign owned automobile plants located in the deep south are responsible for the downfall of the american auto industry then you’ll love American Nations.American Nations
5By mindphalanxI great big brushstrokes picture of American Geo-Ethnic History. Basically, the premise of the book is that various regions of the USA have their own cultural legacy (see Malcolm Gladwell "Outliers"), which determine their politics and social order more so any any particular ethnic group. Essentially, the USA is more of a confederation of competing political and social orders in different regions, and not a monolithic country. The author reasonably explains a variety of historical conflicts through this lens. The explanations are satisfying, and continue to the present day. His explanation of the political coalitions which have dominated at different times is very plausible. IT bears relevance to the current times, and explain why the Republican PArty, despite being essentially a Deep Southern party, which virtually no Latin American or African-American members, has a dominance all out of proportion to their numbers, and indeed even the popularity of their agenda.
