Perils to Self-Efficacy Perceptions and Teacher-Preparation Quality Among Special Education Intern Teachers.

Researchers estimate that 30 percent of teachers are likely to leave the profession within three years (Plash & Piotrowski, 2006). First year special education teachers are two and half times more likely to leave their job than their peers in general education (Smith & Ingersoll, 2004). In California, the attrition rate is 36 percent for special education teachers with two or fewer years of experience, compared to 20 percent for general educators (Levine, Doorlag, & Godlewski, 1995). These dire statistics have a direct bearing on the preparation and retention of special education intern teachers, which are imperiled due to fiscal realities, limited resources, inadequate preparation programs, and increased workloads. How we prepare future teachers of special education is a key if we are to improve the status quo. Colleges and universities are expected to produce a diverse and flexible workforce, instill pedagogically sound and relevant practices, and provide high quality fieldwork experiences for their candidates. Teacher preparation programs are further expected to recruit and aid in teacher retention, particularly in high needs areas such as mathematics, science, and special education. To meet these challenges, some states and institutions of higher education offer alternative credentialing programs that allow those already possessing baccalaureate degrees to be employed by school districts while completing credential requirements (Hawk & Schmidt, 2005). Meeting these challenges often rests on the preparation quality candidate teachers receive and their ability to put it into practice. Whether pathways to credentialing are traditional or alternative, teacher preparation programs must examine a variety of outcome variables associated with effective teacher performance. These can include objective indicators on teaching programs, practices, and policies, and more subjective indicators such as teacher's self-efficacy or perceptions of control (Bandura, 1977, 1997). Because a lack of teacher self-efficacy can undermine even the best of teacher education, it is imperative that we assess the types of perils that can arise in its absence. This is particularly important given the continued limited-resource environments and other threats to an already over-taxed education infrastructure (Nieto, 2005).